For being critical of Meles, couple separated in prison
Former Ethiopian Prime Minister the late Meles Zenawi. Photo/FILE
By CHARLES ONYANGO-OBBO cobbo@ke.nationmedia.com Twitter: @cobbo3
Posted Friday, August 31 2012 at 23:30
Posted Friday, August 31 2012 at 23:30
IN SUMMARY
- To many people, especially Ethiopians, he was a dictator, but Meles Zenawi turned out as a humorous person who smiled a lot in private
When Ethiopia’s Prime Minister Meles Zenawi died on August 20, he took with him not just a secret about him but about other strongmen-cum-reformist African leaders.
That secret is why they resort to pulling fingernails and become intolerant of dissidence – when they don’t have to and could do much better with a more liberal and democratic approach.
For nearly three weeks before Meles died, the Internet had been abuzz with gleeful claims that he had passed away in a Belgian hospital. And when it was officially announced that he had, there was no shortage of his many enemies celebrating his death. The excitement of it all was shocking.
I met Meles for the first, and last, time in early March of 2006. There had been hotly contested elections in March 2005. The opposition accused Meles and his ruling Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) coalition of a massive theft of the vote. There were protests all over the country with the most violent ones being in the capital, Addis Ababa.
Meles cracked down on the protests with a vengeance that shocked his international allies and horrified many Ethiopians. He pulled pages out from the darkest days of Ethiopia’s murderous military junta leader Mengistu Haile Mariam.
Nearly 100 people were killed.
I was part of a delegation picked by the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) – together with CPJ Africa Programme Director Julia Crawford, and veteran journalist and CPJ Board member Charlayne Hunter-Gault – to travel to Ethiopia to plead for the many journalists who had been arrested in the crackdown and charged with treason.
We met Serkalem Fassil, then a 26-year-old beautiful Ethiopian woman. She was, officially, publisher of the Asqual, Menelik and Sanetaw titles. She was five months pregnant, and had been in prison since November 2005.
Eskinder Nega, her fiancé, had been in and out of prison seven times in the past few years. He was the real power behind Asqual, Menelik and Senataw but put Serkalem’s name on the titles as publisher because she was less controversial.
Share This Story
Eksinder and Serkalem were both being held at Kaliti Prison on the outskirts of the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa. Kaliti was then a sprawling prison. In the hot season, according to prisoners’ accounts, the cells turned into a sauna. In the cold season they became an ice box.
Until our visit, Eskinder and Serkalem had not been allowed to see each other. That, however, was not their main concern: their biggest fear was whether their child, their first, would be born in prison.
They were among the nearly 27 journalists arrested in a crackdown on the independent media in the wake of the protests.
In addition to the journalists, more than 100 opposition politicians, NGO activists, lawyers and trade union leaders had also been arrested and charged with conspiracy to overthrow the constitutional order and to commit genocide and other serious crimes for which punishment ranges from 15 years in prison to death.
Scary place to be a journalist
Eskinder and Serkalem were likely to spend the rest of their lives behind bars – if they survived the hangman’s noose.
Ethiopia then, as today, was a very scary place to be a journalist. At that point, if you threw in other cases of journalists who had been arrested over cases unrelated to the post-election fallout, Ethiopia had the highest number of scribes in prison in Africa, and the third highest in the world after China and Cuba. Many had fled – and continued to flee – into exile.
It’s a situation that seemed unlikely even in the final days of the campaigns in May 2005. At that time the government gave the opposition unprecedented access to state broadcast media. On weekends they got as many as four hours of airtime.
While up to 2001 the government had been one of the leading jailers of journalists in the world, it improved its record dramatically and opened 2005 with hardly any in prison.
Then hell broke loose.
SMS banned
For example, partly because the opposition used text messaging to deadly effect to organise, the government banned short messaging service (SMS), and the restrictions were still in place when we arrived… and left.
The irony, though, was that despite the crackdown Ethiopia still had the freest press in the Horn of Africa, testimony to how desperate conditions for journalists were and remain in the region.
A lot of the bad stuff seemed odd, given the changes that had taken place under the Meles-led government and indeed continued to his death.
Ethiopia had just pulled off what most African countries outside South Africa struggle to accomplish – it had completed new runways and a world class airport at Bole. Even at that point, the drive to the south-western city of Nazareth would have been a humbling experience for many other Africans from misruled countries.
The government had done, and continued to do, impressive work on rebuilding infrastructure and a credible industrial economy was already taking form, far ahead of other countries where the big industries are the ones that make curry powder and plastic chairs.
The feverish building boom that has today transformed Addis Ababa from a sleepy ramshackled city of past years was one. One Ethiopian observer was so carried away then and claimed that more housing had come up in Ethiopia in the past decade than in the past 100 years.
And Ethiopian ministers weren’t the unremarkable type you tend to find in most countries in Africa; Meles seemed to pick the best and sharpest. In some ways, that was bad news for the independent press and opposition.
Share This Story
It meant they were up against a government side that was quite accomplished at framing its arguments, whether you agreed or disagreed with them.
Even after hearing that Meles was one of the most articulate African leaders, I was still struck by how brilliant he was when we met him.
In recent years, Ethiopia and Rwanda were the only two African countries to meet the target of increasing agricultural production by 6-8 per cent annually.
They also had the continent’s most impressive record in reducing malaria infections.
Yet all those changes failed to produce the natural result in Ethiopia – a long-term expansion of freedom and democratic space. Instead, the opposite happened.
On the third day of visit, our delegation was informed that in addition to meeting Justice minister Assefa Kessito and his minister of State, the sharp-suited and cerebral Dr Hashim Tewfik, and the State prosecutor the next day, we had been granted access to Kaliti Prison to talk to the jailed journalists.
Then the big one: the Prime Minister would meet us later in the evening.
It was only the third visit by foreigners that the Ethiopian government had allowed to the prison to meet the November prisoners, and the only one whose members had been allowed to inspect the living conditions of the female prison.
A protocol officer was on time with a car to drive us to Kaliti. In a striking similarity with Rwanda, everything worked with clockwork efficiency.
I was puzzled. There was a Meles who seemed to have everything to create a democracy and leave a great legacy. Yet, for many in Ethiopia, he was nothing more than a vindictive dictator and Tigrayan tribal warlord.
And, in fact, his wife Azeb Mesfin (Ethiopia is one of the few countries in Africa where, by tradition, women don’t change their names on marriage) had become the first African First Lady to be elected to Parliament (Winnie Mandela only made it after her divorce from Nelson Mandela).
Before running for Parliament, Mesfin had rarely been seen in public. But she was believed to wield a lot of power, partly because she was heading Mega, the business arm of TPLF, which is the dominant party in the ruling EPRDF coalition.
Meles avoided humiliating us by sending us away empty-handed from the meeting. He acknowledged that it was wrong for prison authorities to deny the journalists books, and told us it must be because of a small bureaucratic misunderstanding that would be resolved.
He also said it was a mistake to deny Eskinder and Serkalam visiting rights simply because they were prisoners, and that that anomaly too would end. At the end of the meeting, he said we could visit the prison again the next day, Saturday, and deliver books and other supplies.
We split assignments. Mine was to gather the books from well-wishers, buy what I could find, get vitamins, and deliver them to Kaliti.
Walking hand-in-hand
The genial prison boss, who introduced himself only as Abraham, was waiting. Happily, the prison authorities didn’t censor the books, despite a few of them having edgy titles with subversive words like “dictatorship”.
I haven’t had many pleasures like I had that day passing the books.
I haven’t had many pleasures like I had that day passing the books.
After our meeting with Meles, Eskinder was allowed to see Serkalem for the first time in prison. Shortly after I arrived, the two of them came walking hand-in-hand, something they hadn’t done in more than four months.
Share This Story
The first time we had been to Kaliti, Serkalem was being escorted away as Eskinder was being brought to meet us because we could only talk with the prisoners one at a time.
They stopped briefly, hugged, kissed, then the prison warders led them away. It was difficult to watch.
Book they desperately wanted
There was really one book that they desperately wanted; it was for Serkalem. It was a pregnancy book. Both she and Eskinder were overcome by emotion when they saw it. They walked away, with the book clasped under Serkalam’s armpit.
Still, the day ended in heartbreak. The journalists had seen us on state TV meeting Meles. They were eager to know what “good news” had come out of the meeting with the PM.
Whatever I said, I knew they were hoping for only one simple word from me – freedom. But that was the one item that hadn’t been categorically on offer. Only the amnesty if the courts found them guilty was what Meles had offered.
Serkalem’s and Nega’s son was born in prison. They named him Nakfot (meaning longing for or missing someone).
In early April 2007, nearly a year after our mission, a court found the journalists guilty. Meles kept his word. On April 10, 2007, Serkalem, Nega and the other journalists were granted a presidential pardon.
Meles will be buried tomorrow in Addis Ababa.
(Meles could have got them released earlier or, better still, not had them arrested. But he did. In the next article next Saturday, we examine the inefficiencies of Meles-style iron-fisted rule, and why the “authoritarian bargain” – where citizens give up their freedoms for economic development and food on the table at home – is nonsensical in Africa.)
Most of the author’s experiences recounted here were first published in ‘Saturday Nation’s’ sister publication, ‘The Daily Monitor’, in Uganda, in March 2006 after he returned from Ethiopia.
No comments:
Post a Comment